GoldWeTrust.com
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

Is Capitalism or is Socialism increasing?

Page 3 of 4 Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

Go down

Is Capitalism or is Socialism increasing? - Page 3 Empty Aaron Russo : Mad As Hell!

Post  Shelby on Sat Aug 14, 2010 8:25 am


Shelby
Admin

Posts : 3107
Join date : 2008-10-21

http://GoldWeTrust.com

Back to top Go down

Is Capitalism or is Socialism increasing? - Page 3 Empty English professor arrested for refusing to play word games in Starbucks!

Post  Shelby on Wed Aug 18, 2010 8:22 pm

Threatened with arrest and kicked out by the police:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/7949440/English-professor-thrown-out-of-Starbucks-after-objecting-to-corporate-language.html

The academic, who is in her early 60s, particularly resented being to forced to state that she did not want butter or cheese on her bagel.

Many cafes ask customers whether they would like such extras with their orders in an attempt to boost takings.

She told the New York Post newspaper: "I refused to say 'without butter or cheese.' When you go to Burger King, you don't have to list the six things you don't want.

"Linguistically, it's stupid, and I'm a stickler for correct English."
Prof Rosenthal added: "The barista said, 'You're not going to get anything unless you say butter or cheese!'"

She claims the manager of the Starbucks on the Upper West Side of Manhattan called the police as the spat escalated. Officers threatened the customer with arrest unless she left the shop and agreed not to return.

A Starbucks staff member who witnessed the clash accused Prof Rosenthal of taking an aggressive tone. They said: "She would not answer. It was a reasonable question."

Perhaps she could have offered to read the entire Websters of nouns just to be clear she didn't want any of those things on her food.

My gosh what totalitarian/retarded mess when now we are even forced to say unnecessary words to order food.

It is closely related to giving people spoons, instead of shovels, so there are more jobs. Once the society enters that "society is responsible for me" mental state, you will get all kinds of this happening.

Shelby
Admin

Posts : 3107
Join date : 2008-10-21

http://GoldWeTrust.com

Back to top Go down

Is Capitalism or is Socialism increasing? - Page 3 Empty Solution

Post  Shelby on Tue Aug 24, 2010 5:19 pm

http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article18068.html#comment94078

Shelby wrote:Buy silver, it will only take 1% of us doing that to bankrupt centralization:

http://silverstockreport.com/2010/one-percent.html

Those who don't buy any will be destitute. We will have to help them by investing our silver. We will be millionaires and billionaires.

Nice solution eh

One threat caveat:

http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article20327.html

Shelby
Admin

Posts : 3107
Join date : 2008-10-21

http://GoldWeTrust.com

Back to top Go down

Is Capitalism or is Socialism increasing? - Page 3 Empty Rising taxes

Post  Shelby on Sun Sep 05, 2010 12:31 am

Is Capitalism or is Socialism increasing? - Page 3 Depres10 <--- click for article

Shelby
Admin

Posts : 3107
Join date : 2008-10-21

http://GoldWeTrust.com

Back to top Go down

Is Capitalism or is Socialism increasing? - Page 3 Empty Delay = Catastrophe

Post  Shelby on Mon Sep 13, 2010 4:14 pm

http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article22612.html#comment94609

Shelby wrote:Rick, actually Mr. Tomlinson is correct that west doesn't need manufacturing per se, it needs to adjust to a net exports balance productive stance in its core strengths, but the reason the western economies are not quickly and positively adjusting to good globalization is because the elite who want bad globalization are destroying the real-time feedback loop in markets that would cause people to make the correct decisions about their present and future:

http://esr.ibiblio.org/?p=2534#comment-278220 (Jocelyn is me)
http://esr.ibiblio.org/?p=2539#comment-278213
http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article20327.html#comment94598 (Good Globalization)

Rather, Rick from your past comments on this site, you propose to introduce more delay and false promises, thus aiding the elite (and playing right into their strategy as they expect you to) in causing a worse catastrophe that will hand them control in a global grab, aka "rescue" or world war:

http://www.google.com/search?q=site:marketoracle.co.uk+Rick+Shelby

Why invest in $0 wages?

Furthermore, manufacturing is being automated and eventually it will add no value and pay no wages. In the next 10 - 20 years, designs fed into a computer will be built and replicated by a nanotechnology bot. The valued added is the services, the design, the engineering, the integration of components, marketing, analysis, etc..

Americans would have a long time ago been more motivated to invest in the future, had their motivation not been turned upside down by the manipulation of interest rates:

http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article20263.html

But the Americans demanded this manipulation and of course supply will always rise to meet demand:

http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article21650.html

Shelby
Admin

Posts : 3107
Join date : 2008-10-21

http://GoldWeTrust.com

Back to top Go down

Is Capitalism or is Socialism increasing? - Page 3 Empty Knowledge is the new money, and it isn't free

Post  Shelby on Wed Sep 15, 2010 11:32 am

Originally written 04-17-2008, 03:53 AM:
shelby wrote:
dash wrote:...In the world I envision human labor is not valuable, or indeed required, because the machines will do all the boring rat-race grunt work people are doing today. In today's world, all money is a representation of human labor. Money as exists today will not exist tomorrow...

Even today, money is not a representation of labor, in fact labor is very cheap and getting cheaper all the time. Money is representation of relative knowledge.

If you could succeed in making everything free as you asserted (see my prior post), then there would be no relative knowledge, as proved today:

https://goldwetrust.forumotion.com/technology-f8/theory-of-everthing-t124.htm#3583

Shelby
Admin

Posts : 3107
Join date : 2008-10-21

http://GoldWeTrust.com

Back to top Go down

Is Capitalism or is Socialism increasing? - Page 3 Empty Insurance = statism

Post  Shelby on Sat Sep 18, 2010 7:14 am

The entire blog page at following link is incredibly informational:

http://esr.ibiblio.org/?p=2556#comment-279096

Shelby aka Jocelyn wrote:The irony of the statist is he feigns rationalism as his argument, but statism is easily demonstrated to be irrational, i.e. logically incongruent with itself. I suppose that is why some anarchists scratch their head and conclude that desire for statism must be correlated to insufficient IQ, but not just any kind of IQ, rather the economic generative essence sort of reasoning capability.

Thus statism and the resultant loss of life is an evolutionary filter, that will increase the generative essence IQ of mankind.

@Jocelyn
> I also wrote the gateway is narrow, but I mean that most people won’t find the door. Anarchy is already occurring for some people.

Some people are already living in anarchy. They accomplish this by reducing their opportunity cost to near 0 for all forms of power created by democracy-by-proxy. They expend 0 effort trying to defeat statism for others. Realize the math of the N! factorial scaling law is such that diverse interactions among small groups of 100 to 1000 people can increase their knowledge beyond any capability of the rest of humanity:

"Do you know how fast N! scales where N is the number of possible independent actors and N! is the possible sets of permutations of connections?

5! = 125
10! = 3628800
100! = 9.3e+157"

Add 1000! = 4.0e+2567

@Jocelyn
> Insurance is mathematically equivalent to statism. If you can’t devise adequate security reliability, then insurance can’t either.

It seems that insurance is one of the last math hurdles for anarchist-to-be. Insurance pools capital and makes statistical predictions about the category being insured. But the anarchist N! math is that real-time change is necessary in order to maximize knowledge, i.e. optimum fitness for each situation requires each actor be uncorrelated/unconstrained in the future (agreement in the present is okay). If that is not sufficient to explain why insurance is mathematically equivalent to statism, then please reply and I will explain it exhaustively.

@Jocelyn
> He said the men are so feminine, that they prefer a bossy/dominant woman.

Please realize I am not excluding individual cases, as I argued in my white hot coals and blocks of ice heterogeneous analogy, the average obfuscates the diversity.

One of the planks of the Communist Manifesto is “no oppressed child labor, no submissive barefoot and pregnant women”. Everything is supposed to be equal, e.g. women as a category are supposed to be as good as men in math but standardized tests show they are not. The statist argues that this is environmental and can be “fixed” with a proper public education and sterilization policy. So it is no big surprise that the birth rates in Europe are extinction level, and for another reason being children are universally undesirable because their labor is taboo.

Shelby aka Jocelyn wrote:@Roger Phillips
> We have had free universal healthcare for years and yet we are not growing a deficit.

That is a cash accounting statistics. Do the actuarial accounting and you find a huge unfunded liability that implodes your economy in the end. Do not forget to include the low birth rates in the calculation.

> Ireland, New Zealand, Israel all have universal, free health care, and all have birth rates higher than the US.

The correlation being debate earlier was relative to statism, not the small subset of universal health care. Obviously some countries are younger in their adoption of statism and haven't yet reaped the "benefits" of the Communist Manifesto plank on the elimination of children. Do we need to refute your mistake 7 times?

@Tom DeGisi
> It is often said that communism would work well if humans were ants. Well, anarchism would work well if humans were bears.

@Jocelyn
> You make legislation to regulate every insect on planet earth, especially ants.
> Can they stomp all the ants on earth? Somethings are just impossible.
> Afaik, ants form an N! virtual information network even though their physical network is hierarchal bifurcating tree.

Ants and bees are anarchists, they use N! factorial virtual network scaling law.

Their physical network is not N! factorial, but rather a bifurcating tree gaining statism trunk-wise (queen bee/ant).

Although they are statist in their protection of their physical trunk, the orthogonal colonies (one can even view small, large, red, black colonies operating side-by-side but not communicating with each other) form redundancy.

Shelby
Admin

Posts : 3107
Join date : 2008-10-21

http://GoldWeTrust.com

Back to top Go down

Is Capitalism or is Socialism increasing? - Page 3 Empty Re: Is Capitalism or is Socialism increasing?

Post  Shelby on Sat Sep 18, 2010 3:08 pm

http://esr.ibiblio.org/?p=2556#comment-279140

Shelby aka Jocelyn wrote:@Winter
> Market economies generate a lot of wealth. However, they seem to be pretty bad in distribution it.
> I am told that there are no empirical ways to prove the correctness of the anti-statist theses

"Sorry to beat a dead" duck, there is some historical evidence that anti-statism (aka anarchy) distributes wealth more equitably and increases prosperity faster.

Winter I genuinely believe that you believe in your public health, public education, long-life, public safety, equitable wealth, civilized society, etc.. That is the grotesque nature of statism-- it lies to its own before it eats them. The signature of statism is to expect its members to gleefully spout how wonderful it is to ignorantly poison+addict, indoctrinate, cannibalize, dis-arm, steal, and barbarize each other.

Some Guy named Timothy wrote a fairy tale about this phenomenon, "For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, [...] Ever learning, and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth [...] But they shall proceed no further: for their folly shall be manifest unto all men, as their's also was". And even another warning was given, "Now listen to them; but warn them solemnly and let them know what the king who will reign over them will do". But the people refused, "'No!' they said. 'We want a king over us. Then we will be like all the other nations, with a king to lead us and to go out before us and fight our battles'". And then the fairy tale was fulfilled as promised, "Now go [...] and utterly destroy all that they have, and spare them not; but slay both man and woman, infant and suckling, ox and sheep, camel and ass".

Shelby aka Jocelyn wrote:@The Monster
>> Crime is a free market.
>
> No, it isn’t. When a burglar breaks into my home [...] I did not freely enter into the transaction. He imposed it upon me by force.

Actually crime is a free market. The other things you mentioned were your statist attempts to avoid the annealing of the free market. It is each person's responsibility to effect his/her ownership. If you allow the burglar to break in and you did not shoot him, then you lose, and that is the way the free market teaches us (anneals to) several things:

1. Don't pretend I own that which I do not. There is a fairy tale that says we are just stewards.
2. Don't ignore the poor.
3. Don't blame others for my failures.
4. Secure things which I own, which I don't think the poor need more than I do (e.g. if I am investing to lift them up more than they could).
5. Don't let capital sit idle because I am too inept to use it to lift the poor up.

Statism is simply a result of the inability of men to submit to the free market. The anarchist-to-be who claims public property rights enforcement (or insurance which is the same statist poison), is incongruent in his/her expectations.

The new economy makes it even easier to accept and embrace the free market, because orthogonal (referentially transparent) knowledge (aka sharing, even monetized so lets call it transacting), benefits from being stolen (shared). Tada!

Linus Law again.

Note what I mean above is that theft (sharing) of software enables it to be popular enough that people who find it more convenient, will pay for it.

Copute is designed to make it possible for creators to move back to closed-source, because the interfaces are referentially transparent (open) and granular. Each person can fix a bug by replacing the closed-source snippet.

Shelby aka Jocelyn wrote:@Adam
> A free market is a market free of force and coercion

False. It is a market free of forward contracts, including the statist variety.

The anarchist-to-be who does not understand that most fundamental point is hopelessly conflicted and will not accomplish much.

I wrote a long comment explaining this in more detail, but it was censored.

But it doesn't matter, because I am publishing all my comments to several different blogs. Truth can not be stopped.

Shelby aka Jocelyn wrote:@Winter
> Is your biggest fear really that someone might profit from your work? That predicts a rather unfriendly anarchistic society.

I dealt with that in my prior comment which was censored. Actually the anarchist model I proposed, insures that everyone profits, because all knowledge is orthogonal and benefits from being stolen (aka shared). I have made the point numerous times in the past few blogs that open source does not cannibalize profits, rather it prioritizes speed of integration. We were put on this earth to love each other, and that means to accelerate our priorities towards the greatest benefits for the most in need. The difference between the anarchist and the statist, is the later proposes to accomplish it by force, which incongruent to the goal. Unfortunately our moderator thinks this is "nutty", but what will be "nutty" is the decision to ban the messenger of the idea that changes the world. I am recording this by posting these to numerous blogs with links back here, so we can made our resident censor more famous for this than his Linus Law.

Shelby aka Jocelyn wrote:It is particularly relevant to this anarchy thread, to ponder the non-narcissist, algorithmically correct response when potentially asked in the future about Copute, "Should Eric Raymond be demoted to 'the guy who censored [the messenger of] an idea that radically improved the world'?".

Seems it would be mathematically superior to answer before it is asked-- publish soonest and often.

In a free market, although it is ironic that Raymond scolds Apple for insufficient openness on its iPhone app store, Apple and Raymond both have the freedom to censor what they allow their users to see and use, even after both creator and users have already a vested mutual interest dependent on the gatekeeper.

Coase's theorem will decide if a gatekeeper's authority should be reduced or increased. I understand that both the surety contract (e.g. promise of no censorship) and the centralized decision (i.e. authority) distort the optimum annealing of the free market, but so would no authority and imposition of the will of a spammer on all users.

Spam (aka trolling) is mathematically defined as very low information content, as correlated to the users' interests. A gatekeeper's interests that diverge from the users' interest, will not be respected by Coase's theorem. I have algorithm ideas about how blog software should enable the users to select what they want filtered, but we don't have that capability yet in this case.

So the answer is finally that if such a characterization of Raymond's legacy becomes popular, then "should?" is no longer relevant.

I hope that logic has freed our emotions to carry on with more productive endeavors.

Note this has been posted to numerous blogs in order to minimize the potential re-routing damage inflicted by Coase's theorem.

Note the reason I am posting as "Jocelyn" is because Eric Raymond had banned my true identity "Shelby Moore" last year.

http://esr.ibiblio.org/?p=2568#comment-279070

Shelby aka Jocelyn wrote:@Jocelyn
> Better model for attacking tyranny is one that is popular, then anonymity is not relevant [...] More effective
> to work on popular models which the entire Iranian population will use that are like termites to statism.

China as evidence.

Note the above post was censored by Eric Raymond.

Shelby
Admin

Posts : 3107
Join date : 2008-10-21

http://GoldWeTrust.com

Back to top Go down

Is Capitalism or is Socialism increasing? - Page 3 Empty Re: Is Capitalism or is Socialism increasing?

Post  Shelby on Fri Sep 24, 2010 3:42 am

http://esr.ibiblio.org/?p=2556&cpage=9#comment-279818

Shelby aka Jocelyn wrote:> Why can’t we all have the amount and kinds of regulation and redistribution we want?

Because of the iron law of political economics is such that the dead-weight *must* metastasize and eventually kill the host, due to power vacuum between what individuals want (their opportunity cost) and the group's opportunity cost which can be forced on individuals.

Cycles of socialism catastrophe is what we get until individuals have the technological capacity to ignore the will of the majority, i.e. the power vacuum is eliminated.

Shelby
Admin

Posts : 3107
Join date : 2008-10-21

http://GoldWeTrust.com

Back to top Go down

Is Capitalism or is Socialism increasing? - Page 3 Empty States are doing Enron accounting

Post  Shelby on Thu Sep 30, 2010 11:10 pm


Bad things coming next year.

Shelby
Admin

Posts : 3107
Join date : 2008-10-21

http://GoldWeTrust.com

Back to top Go down

Is Capitalism or is Socialism increasing? - Page 3 Empty Centralized policy causes Minsky moment (abrupt) change

Post  Shelby on Sat Oct 02, 2010 1:21 am

I have started to comment at world reknowned Dr. Chris Martenson's blog:

http://www.chrismartenson.com/blog/prediction-things-will-unravel-faster-than-you-think/45297#comment-90238

Shelby wrote:Most people think sovereign bonds interest rates must rise soon, but afaics, they fail to understand the nature of the global debt trap we are in:

http://financialsense.com/contributors/shelby-moore/perpetual-deflation-causes-inflation

Dr. Martenson, the most fundamental aspect that causes abrupt change, i.e. Minsky moments, is that centralization of policy prevents optimum annealing.

Or more generally stated, the universe is trending to maximum disorder, and pockets of exponential order along the way, implode back to trend exponentially. Failure to comprehend the exponential quality of nature, i.e. entropy, is the greatest human inability.

A person I often agree with, the monetary PhD scientist Antal Fekete has postulated that the Yuan is strong.

But the reason that I disagree with him is very relevant to why tariffs do not work.

The centralization of fitness is always a weakness. Maximum annealing to optimum fitness only occurs with a free market of individual trials. I am sure Dr. Fekete understands why I say, this is why only gold is money.

For the specific weaknesses of China's centralized economic and monetary policy, read my recent article.

Note I recently wrote a scholarly research paper about the theory of annealing fitness and free markets. That research derives or fits into a theory of the universe that I have proposed as a way to unify Einstein's General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics (Quantum Information). (note I am planning to study "Q-Orders" as potential self-similarity case of "frequency" in my theory)

As for Peak Oil, we have more Natural Gas in the world that we know what to do with, and cars run just as well with CNG as they do on gasoline or diesel, losing only 10% power if a $1000 conversion kit is employed on a gas engine without compression ratio increase. Honda's CNG Civic is equivalent to gas in performance, except your cost per mile drops significantly due to the fact that CNG is much less expensive per energy unit than gas. And we can make our own CNG in our back yard from human and animal feces, or even from any organic matter. Also nuclear and then later nanotech will reduce the cost of energy significantly. Those who like to quote EROEI, forget that energy efficiency is a function of technology, since everything (i.e. my definition of 'matter') that is not infinitely disordered, contains some energy. It is the relative order that allows energy to do useful work.

However, we are likely to see Minsky moments with respect to oil, because of the non-optimum annealing rate due to centralized policy of many genres. This is just the way nature deals with change.

I made a follow up comment:

http://www.chrismartenson.com/blog/prediction-things-will-unravel-faster-than-you-think/45297#comment-90249
http://www.chrismartenson.com/martensonreport/prediction-things-will-unravel-faster-than-you-think#comment-90265
http://www.chrismartenson.com/blog/prediction-things-will-unravel-faster-than-you-think/45297?page=1#comment-90328
http://www.chrismartenson.com/blog/prediction-things-will-unravel-faster-than-you-think/45297?page=2#comment-90389
http://www.chrismartenson.com/blog/prediction-things-will-unravel-faster-than-you-think/45297?page=2#comment-90391
http://www.chrismartenson.com/blog/prediction-things-will-unravel-faster-than-you-think/45297?page=3#comment-90396
http://www.chrismartenson.com/blog/prediction-things-will-unravel-faster-than-you-think/45297?page=3#comment-90397
http://www.chrismartenson.com/blog/prediction-things-will-unravel-faster-than-you-think/45297?page=5#comment-90474
http://www.chrismartenson.com/blog/prediction-things-will-unravel-faster-than-you-think/45297?page=6#comment-90646
http://www.chrismartenson.com/blog/prediction-things-will-unravel-faster-than-you-think/45297?page=6#comment-90650


Last edited by Shelby on Thu Oct 07, 2010 11:58 am; edited 7 times in total

Shelby
Admin

Posts : 3107
Join date : 2008-10-21

http://GoldWeTrust.com

Back to top Go down

Is Capitalism or is Socialism increasing? - Page 3 Empty Forward selling gold for "LBMA spot"

Post  Shelby on Thu Oct 07, 2010 1:24 pm


Shelby
Admin

Posts : 3107
Join date : 2008-10-21

http://GoldWeTrust.com

Back to top Go down

Is Capitalism or is Socialism increasing? - Page 3 Empty Big mess solved by individual action

Post  Shelby on Sun Oct 10, 2010 5:19 am

http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article23382.html#comment95364

Shelby wrote:Rick we already had this debate and you did not reply to the final conclusion:

http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article23142.html#comment95223

The new information I want to offer is that the big socialism mess ("Great Harlot system") is going to die irregardless of how you try to save it:

http://www.chrismartenson.com/blog/prediction-things-will-unravel-faster-than-you-think/45297?page=6#comment-90991

The only options forward are individual decisions to come out of the big mess. The political non-solutions you are suggesting, won't work to save the big mess of socialism.

Rick you do realize you are being a socialist, when you want collective action?

http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article23382.html#comment95389

Shelby wrote:re: France & Economics 101

Rick, you are conflating the issues.

Some of France's main reasons for economic success are the individual actions:

1) their women make enough babies, unlike rest of EU, so they do not have horrific funding crisis due to declining population and youth.

2) Their INDIVIDUAL small farmers right for their individual interests and resist being used as pawns for nationalistic collective action (as is your proposed tariff):

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/frances-farmers-cause-a-stink-over-fast-food-1115226.html

The above free market individual actions are enough apparently to offset some of the negative socialistic pursuits of the unions in France:

http://www.just-food.com/news/farmers-intensify-pressure-over-milk-prices_id112077.aspx

Rick you simply don't understand Economics 101. If you manipulate (distort) the pricing of the market, you distort the market supply and demand, but nature always finds a way around your manipulation and thus your manipulation is a misallocation of resources and will come crashing down with great loss to those who participated.

You ask what individual actions we can do to escape the socialism and fascism we have now? Well certainly not adding more socialism (amazing you try to fix your problem by making it worse and adding to power of those who are manipulating you and you can't even see that!).

Well for one, buy gold and silver and save more. Second, move out the USA, or move to a rural area to lower expenses to near 0, and take up farming and a vocation on the internet. I am paying big money for programmers, graphic design, etc.

Rather you waste our time and effort with your nonsense proposal to distort of the market even more, which of course the politically connected will profit from most. I will sure I computer program (social networking, etc) ways around your tariff.

End of debate. It is nonsense. You don't get it.

Shelby
Admin

Posts : 3107
Join date : 2008-10-21

http://GoldWeTrust.com

Back to top Go down

Is Capitalism or is Socialism increasing? - Page 3 Empty How the banks outsmarted us again

Post  Shelby on Wed Oct 20, 2010 11:50 pm

Folks, I am sorry to tell you that no real estate purchased after 1980 is owned by any one. This is major crisis. See the chart on this page:

http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article23629.html

I figured out the likely reason the banks accelerated the foreclosures. Again nobody gets it. They think the banks are the losers, but they fail to understand this is socialism and the people are the losers.

http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article23558.html

Shelby wrote:"fix" title chain = bank bailout

Well I know how this one will work out. Again the banksters have outsmarted us. The economy will rollover because of this, then the govt will have to buy out the mess and regulate the fix. The banks will get their bailout #2. Wash, rinse, repeat the cycle of raping the globe.

From the article above:

anonymous insider wrote:So somewhere between the REMICs and MERS, the chain of title was broken.

To repeat: if the chain of title of the note is broken, then the borrower no longer owes any money on the loan.

alarm bells started going off when the title insurance companies started to refuse to insure the titles.

This is a major, major crisis. The Lehman bankruptcy could be a spring rain compared to this hurricane. And if this isn't handled right...and handled right quick, in the next couple of weeks at the outside...this crisis could also spell the end of the mortgage business altogether. Of banking altogether. Hell, of civil society. What do you think happens in a country when the citizens realize they don't need to pay their debts?

Mauldin wrote:Let's be very clear. If we cannot securitize mortgages, there is no mortgage market. We cannot go back to where lenders warehoused the notes. It would take a decade to build that infrastructure. In the meantime, housing prices are devastated. Whatever wealth effect remains from housing gets worse, and the economy rolls over.

Some think we need some regulatory fixes. Some think we will need a legislative cure. But if we need to, there need be no finger pointing, no partisan BS. This needs to get solved.

Someone took out a mortgage. Some entity thinks they are owed money. Fix the damn paper trail so that happens, whether in a legal if time-consuming manner, in a regulatory fix, or with legislation.

Shelby
Admin

Posts : 3107
Join date : 2008-10-21

http://GoldWeTrust.com

Back to top Go down

Is Capitalism or is Socialism increasing? - Page 3 Empty HomeDepot founder unloads on the government

Post  Shelby on Tue Oct 26, 2010 4:29 am


Shelby
Admin

Posts : 3107
Join date : 2008-10-21

http://GoldWeTrust.com

Back to top Go down

Is Capitalism or is Socialism increasing? - Page 3 Empty Freedom-of-speech

Post  Shelby on Sat Oct 30, 2010 1:17 am

http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article23882.html#comment95940

Shelby wrote:Nadeem wrote:
"Though at least we retain freedom of speech and the secret police are not out bumping people off that the state does not agree with."

This is primarily due to the technology of camera and video inside everyone's pocket, and the internet to distribute it virally to millions of viewers.

This is why the NWO will ultimately fail, but the problem is on those issues that the masses don't understand well and masses can be easily manipulated to think in terms of what the banksters want. For example Rick supporting tariffs and Nadeem thinking money is fiat, and others who think insurance is a good thing, all those misunderstandings cause the masses to fall deeper into the NWO direction:

http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article23862.html#comment95941

Shelby
Admin

Posts : 3107
Join date : 2008-10-21

http://GoldWeTrust.com

Back to top Go down

Is Capitalism or is Socialism increasing? - Page 3 Empty Newt Gingrich, no wonder he was kicked out!

Post  Shelby on Tue Nov 02, 2010 4:30 am

The first politician who actually understands and can articulate (even Ron Paul doesn't understand):

http://www.kitco.com/KitcoNewsVideo/kitco_news.htm (video of interview)
http://www.kitco.com/reports/KitcoNews20101101DC_interview.html

Shelby
Admin

Posts : 3107
Join date : 2008-10-21

http://GoldWeTrust.com

Back to top Go down

Is Capitalism or is Socialism increasing? - Page 3 Empty Re: Is Capitalism or is Socialism increasing?

Post  Shelby on Thu Nov 11, 2010 4:35 pm

My opinion...

The decentralizing is happening now, because dozens of developing countries are joining the world economy.

But in this framework, the dollar will be replaced by an initially weaker global currency, but this is on net a move towards greater centralization at the end game which is probably some 30+ years from now, if not longer.

That is where the centralization has no outlets as we do now, so mankind is nearly exterminated in order for the centralization to break apart. That will be the undoing of the elite and a big chunk of mankind with it.

That is not a very refined way of explaining what i mean, because I am very sleepy and in rush.

Unfortunately I don't think we will get to see it in our lifetime if we don't live to be centurarians.

Shelby
Admin

Posts : 3107
Join date : 2008-10-21

http://GoldWeTrust.com

Back to top Go down

Is Capitalism or is Socialism increasing? - Page 3 Empty Sweden

Post  Shelby on Sat Feb 26, 2011 6:51 am

Julian Assange (Wikileaks) is in big trouble if he gets sent there for trial, why did he ever go to a country like that (Assange seems to idolize good governance, he is not a true libertarian that wants no governance):

http://www.caseyresearch.com/displayCwc.php?id=93

some poor woman in Sweden who's had her twin daughters taken away by the child protection busybodies. The children were taken – without notice – from their school, and the woman didn't even know it was an official abduction until she got a letter a week later. The real horror of it is that there isn't actually any evidence of wrongdoing on the woman's part. The law is preemptive and protective – the bureaucrats are authorized to remove children from their families if there might be danger to them. No due process, and forget about "innocent until proven guilty." The breathtaking assumption is that it's better to rip children out of their families than to find out if there's a real problem first. This could only hold sway in a place where the culture is one of great confidence in the wisdom and benevolence of the state.

Doug: Scandinavia is on a slippery slope. I wouldn't be surprised if a very nasty "black swan" the size of a pterodactyl landed there. The U.S. isn't far behind. Big Brother is coming out of the cellar, where he's been chained up, in the U.S. And I'm afraid he's so strong and nasty that few people will be able to pay him enough to leave them alone.

There have long been local pockets of notorious corruption in the U.S., of course: building inspectors, people like that. On a national level, the DEA became very corrupt early on – a natural consequence of "regulating" an industry that runs on billions in cash.

Other federal agencies are more subtly corrupt. Generals are paid off by being hired by defense contractors after they're mustered out.

Shelby
Admin

Posts : 3107
Join date : 2008-10-21

http://GoldWeTrust.com

Back to top Go down

Is Capitalism or is Socialism increasing? - Page 3 Empty $3 trillion state public pension shortfall, to be $6 trillion

Post  Shelby on Mon Mar 07, 2011 2:17 am

I suspect these plans are invested in bonds, so they will be 100% underfunded by the end.

http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2010/04/interactive-map-of-public-pension-plans.html

That is just the state public workers pensions. That doesn't include private sector pensions (which is much larger number of people) nor federal entitlement unfunded liabilities.

When you add it all up it is well into the $100+ trillion range. I think federal govt alone is $50+ trillion.

Shelby
Admin

Posts : 3107
Join date : 2008-10-21

http://GoldWeTrust.com

Back to top Go down

Is Capitalism or is Socialism increasing? - Page 3 Empty Re: Is Capitalism or is Socialism increasing?

Post  Shelby on Tue Mar 08, 2011 7:12 pm

Interestingly Bill Gross of Pimco said that household savings rate is 6%, while the govts are at -10% thus giving the nation a negative savings rate.

But this is just a transfer of wealth from the socialism to the private sector!

The wise private sector is milking the socialism and saving it.

We have a battle between the socialism tit suckers and the private savers ahead. Madison, Wisconsin is the first salvo.

Shelby
Admin

Posts : 3107
Join date : 2008-10-21

http://GoldWeTrust.com

Back to top Go down

Is Capitalism or is Socialism increasing? - Page 3 Empty re: competition ("silveraction")

Post  Shelby on Wed Mar 09, 2011 10:40 pm

http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article26782.html#comment102408

Shelby wrote:
The problem is when the wealthy use their wealth to prevent competition, i.e. read Wikileaks about how the US govt conspired with Monsanto to force GMO seeds on Europe via trade war threats. Or Bill Gates and Warren Buffet's activities in Africa to spread GMO there.

The best way to fight back is for the common people to buy silver and bankrupt the fiat system that these globalists are using to destroy the world. Silver is their Achilles heel. Gold is good, but silver is a metaphorical bullet. I do not advocate violence. If only 1% of the middle class sold their houses, rent, and buy silver, the globalists would be impotent and destroyed. Come on people, what are you waiting for? Instead you want to waste your time in the black hole of politics. Actions speak louder than words. Silveraction.

P.S. be prepared for silver fiat price correction this year.

From a prior post in this thread in 2007 in jasonhommelforum.com:

Jim,

http://cryptogon.com/?p=706



Gold will set the international "exchange rate" between the absurb, inflating fiat currencies. The IMF may already already preparing for this. I think perhaps the SDRs (special drawing rights) may be backed with Gold given to IMF by member countries (mostly from USA I think).

The point is that at the end, the failure of the regional currencies will be used to reach a one-world"666" currency, where gold will be so valuable, that you dare not hold it, else you will be beheaded.

So the next step is to move to 3 regional currencies, with gold as the exchange mechanism, so we can reload another hyperinflation cycle with expanding global trade.

Then when the pan-Asian currency reaches the current state of dollar debt, then cabal will have destroyed all resistance, and they can move to one-world "666" true social order.

Asian currencies are not officially backed with gold, but asians don't trust their governments and they prefer to hold hard assets than fiat. So the cabal must first get Asia to integrate into the modern fiat regime, before they go for one world currency.

There are still too many people living in rural areas, who store some hard assets (e.g. gold, corn, wheat, etc) as their savings. There are still too many semi-independent people in the world, so the cabal can not move too fast towards total fiat system. They have to allow gold to go way up in value, suck the world in, then exhale again with super high interest rates, build up world trade, then run the Asian debt bubble to it's end. This won't happen in this cycle.

This current cycle is about killing the dollar with debt, sucking in as much as possible in 3rd world, then move to gold international exchange, towards 3 regional currency regimes. So the Asian currency regime will gain in prominence against the dollar. But that currency does not exist yet. The yuan will have to be combined to make something bigger before it is re-valued extensively. Gold will be necessary to get that done and accepted by all the Asian countries.

Only God can save us from the final 666 currency. But that is not what this cycle is about, although I do think we will see many horrible things in this cycle, as we did in the last global inflection point cycle from early 1900s to 1944.

Shelby
Admin

Posts : 3107
Join date : 2008-10-21

http://GoldWeTrust.com

Back to top Go down

Is Capitalism or is Socialism increasing? - Page 3 Empty Re: Is Capitalism or is Socialism increasing?

Post  Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Page 3 of 4 Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum